diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'project/templates/stvcount.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | project/templates/stvcount.html | 304 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 304 deletions
diff --git a/project/templates/stvcount.html b/project/templates/stvcount.html deleted file mode 100644 index 8d4c3ae..0000000 --- a/project/templates/stvcount.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,304 +0,0 @@ - -{%- extends "base.html" -%} - - - -{%- block title -%}Single Transferable Vote Counter{%- endblock -%} - - - -{%- block style %} - <link href="/css/stvcount.css" rel="stylesheet" /> -{% endblock -%} - - - -{%- block content %} -<h4>Single Transferable Vote Counter</h4> - -<p>Git repository: <a href="/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/stv-count">Link</a></p> - -<h5>19/2/2017</h5> - -<p>To give an incredibly brief summary of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Australia" -class="external">Australia's political system</a>, both the Federal Parliament and most of the State -Parliaments are bicameral. The lower houses are generally elected by Instant Runoff, while the upper -houses generally have half elections using Single Transferable Vote. There are exceptions and a -whole lot of differing details, but that's the overall pattern.</p> - -<p>In 2016, however, the Federal Parliament underwent a Double Dissolution, causing the entirety of -both houses to go to an election. This had the outcome of 20 out of 76 seats going to third parties -in the upper house, a record number. Even more than the 18 there were prior. As the entire purpose -of a Double Dissolution is to break deadlocks in parliament, to have the outcome go in the -<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-03/crabb-election-2016-is-lose-lose-for-malcolm-turnbull/7565840" -class="external">complete opposite direction</a> probably caused some dismay from Malcolm Turnbull -and his Liberal/National government.</p> - -<p>This raises the question: Would they have been better off had a normal election happened instead? -</p> - -<p>To calculate the likely outcome, the ballot preference data is needed. That's the easy part, as -the Australian Electoral Commission makes that available -<a href="http://results.aec.gov.au/20499/Website/SenateDownloadsMenu-20499-Csv.htm" class="external"> -here</a> in the 'Formal preferences' section. Then, a program is needed to execute the STV -algorithm, which is as follows:</p> - -<ol> - <li>Set the quota of votes required for a candidate to win.</li> - <li>Allocate the ballot papers according to first preference to each of the candidates for - initial vote totals.</li> - <li>Mark any candidate who has reached or exceeded the quota as elected.</li> - <li>If any elected candidate has more votes than the quota, transfer the excess to the other - candidates according to the next applicable preference.</li> - <li>If no further candidates meet the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated - and their votes are transferred to the others according to next applicable preference.</li> - <li>Repeat steps 3-5 until all seats are filled.</li> -</ol> - -<p>Seems simple enough, right? Except not really. There is a surprising amount of complexity in -there, and most of it is to do with how to transfer votes around. So, in addition, there are the -specifics for the version used for the Australian Senate:</p> - -<ul> - <li>Voters are given the option of voting either "above the line" or "below the line". The - latter is standard STV. The former used to be a group voting ticket, but for 2016 and later - it is treated as a shorthand way of voting, as per instructions - <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/Voting/How_to_vote/Voting_Senate.htm" class="external">here</a>.</li> - <li>There are <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/candidates/files/ballot-paper-formality guidelines.pdf" class="external">specific guidelines</a> on what constitutes a correctly filled - out ballot. This is important for parsing the formal preference data.</li> - <li>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droop_quota" class="external">Droop quota</a> is - used.</li> - <li>All votes are transferred from elected candidates at a fraction of their value, as per the - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counting_single_transferable_votes#Gregory" class="external"> - Gregory Method</a>. This can result in fractions with surprisingly large numerators and - denominators. This also results in occasional discarding of fractional votes during - transfers.</li> - <li>Should the next applicable preference of a ballot be a candidate who has already been - elected, that preference is ignored and the ballot is transferred to the next preference. - </li> - <li>If the number of remaining candidates is equal to one more than the number of remaining - vacancies, the candidates with the highest vote totals at that point are considered elected. - </li> -</ul> - -<p>My implementation also includes <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counting_single_transferable_votes#Bulk_exclusions" -class="external">bulk exclusions</a> using applied breakpoints in order to increase speed slightly -and minimise superfluous logging.</p> - -<p>At this point I'm fairly sure my program provides an accurate count. However, my numbers still -differ slightly from the ones provided by the AEC's official distribution of preferences. -Investigations into the exact cause are ongoing.</p> - -<h4>Results</h4> - -<p>Calculations were done for each state using the formal preference data with vacancies set to 6 -instead of 12, and the results were added to the Senators elected in 2013 to find the probable -outcome. The results for ACT and NT were taken as-is, because the few Senators elected from the -territories are not part of the half election cadence anyway.</p> - -<p>Computational resources required varied from approximately 50 seconds using 46MB of memory for -Tasmania, to nearly 30 minutes using 1452MB memory for NSW. The vast majority of that time was spent -parsing preference data, and the program is single threaded, so there is still room for improvement. -All counts were run on a Core 2 Quad Q9500.</p> - -<table> - <caption>Probable non-DD results by state</caption> - <tr> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">NSW</th> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">VIC</th> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">QLD</th> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">SA</th> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">WA</th> - <th colspan="2" style="width:10em;">TAS</th> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#1456F1; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal National</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:green; width:8px;"> </td><td>National</td> - <td style="background-color:#1456F1; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal National</td> - <td style="background-color:#FF6300; width:8px;"> </td><td>Xenophon</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:green; width:8px"> </td><td>National</td> - <td style="background-color:#10C25B; width:8px;"> </td><td>Green</td> - <td style="background-color:#F8F16F; width:8px;"> </td><td>One Nation</td> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td><td>Labor</td> - <td style="background-color:#10C25B; width:8px;"> </td><td>Green</td> - <td style="background-color:#E36137; width:8px;"> </td><td>Jacqui Lambie</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#10C25B; width:8px"> </td><td>Green</td> - <td style="background-color:#002F5D; width:8px;"> </td><td>Derryn Hinch</td> - <td style="background-color:#1456F1; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal National</td> - <td style="background-color:#FF6300; width:8px;"> </td><td>Xenophon</td> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td><td>Liberal</td> - <td style="background-color:#10C25B; width:8px;"> </td><td>Green</td> - </tr> -</table> - -<table> - <caption>Probable non-DD Senate composition</caption> - <tr> - <th colspan="2" style="width:24em">Party</th> - <th style="width:9em">Seats Won</th> - <th style="width:9em">Continuing Senators</th> - <th style="width:9em">Total Seats</th> - <th style="width:9em">Difference From Actual</th> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#080CAB; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Liberal/National Coalition</td> - <td>17</td> - <td>15</td> - <td>32</td> - <td>+2</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#F00011; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Australian Labor Party</td> - <td>14</td> - <td>10</td> - <td>24</td> - <td>-2</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#10C25B; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Australian Greens</td> - <td>4</td> - <td>4</td> - <td>8</td> - <td>-1</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#FF6300; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Xenophon Group</td> - <td>2</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>3</td> - <td>Nil</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#E36137; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Jacqui Lambie Network*</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>2</td> - <td>+1</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#F9E518; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Liberal Democratic Party</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>Nil</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#00CCFF; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Family First Party</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>Nil</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#FFED00; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Palmer United Party*</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>+1</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:gray; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Glenn Lazarus Team*</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>+1</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#191970; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>+1</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#F8F16F; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">One Nation</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>-3</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td style="background-color:#002F5D; width:8px;"> </td> - <td class="left">Derryn Hinch's Justice Party</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>0</td> - <td>1</td> - <td>Nil</td> - </tr> -</table> - -<p>* These three parties were all part of the Palmer United Party at the 2013/2014 election, but -split up mid term.</p> - -<p>Surprisingly, these projected results <em>still</em> have 20 out of 76 seats held by third party -candidates, despite the half election putting them at a disadvantage. The number of third party -groups the Liberal/Nationals have to negotiate with to pass legislation (assuming Labor and Greens -attempt to block) equally remains unchanged.</p> - -<p>The Greens manage to do slightly worse, even though their usual position of winning the 5th or -6th seat in most states often allows them to obtain more representation than their primary vote -would otherwise support. This can't even be attributed to a bad 2013 result, as their primary vote -both then and in 2016 was nearly identical.</p> - -<p>One Nation's much reduced number of seats can be attributed to the inherent geographic bias that -any system involving electing candidates across many independent divisions has. If like-minded -voters are all in one place, they receive representation, but when the same number of voters are -spread out, they get nothing. When this effect is intentionally exploited it's called -gerrymandering, but here it's merely an artifact of electing Senators from each state separately. -One Nation's support is strongest in Queensland but is relatively diffuse. Any claims of Pauline -Hanson being <a href="http://junkee.com/malcolm-turnbull-will-probably-need-pauline-hansons-support-to-pass-any-laws/82138" class="external">one of the most powerful politicians in Australia</a> are thus -overblown.</p> - -<p>The Xenophon Group, by contrast, has the vast majority of their support concentrated in South -Australia. So the result for them remains unchanged.</p> - -<p>The most noteworthy outcomes for the question though, are that the Liberal/Nationals would have -obtained more seats, and Labor would have been in a more difficult position to block the passage of -legislation. Meaning that yes, the Liberal/National government would definitely have been better off -with a normal election.</p> - -<p>Nice job screwing over your own party, Malcolm.</p> -{% endblock -%} - - |