From 2b8b55de4a18757e8d6769e458c84f7c1df1e261 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jed Barber Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:13 +1100 Subject: Swapped out crypto package for something smaller, revised other code and readme/notes slightly --- notes.txt | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'notes.txt') diff --git a/notes.txt b/notes.txt index 250dcee..54f94a6 100644 --- a/notes.txt +++ b/notes.txt @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ preference deduplication isn't worth it unless there exists some linear dedupe a future direction ---------------- -better commented code, because I'm going to have to maintain this later +revise and better comment code, because I'm going to have to maintain this later util to list paper ids that fit specific criteria to doublecheck potential errors @@ -25,6 +25,4 @@ are they correct now? it's a bit murky with how the AEC records transfers in DOP does the AEC use truncated values or exact ratios for transfer values? does the AEC check for candidates having quota when transfers are only partially done? -REPLACE CRYPTO BIGNUM PACKAGES WITH OWN IMPLEMENTATION - -- cgit