From 57fa1fb21a14e4bfa9a130535a4a0453d52bf42a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jed Barber Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:11:17 +1000 Subject: Fixed line length to fit in 80col --- license.txt | 6 +++--- rationale.txt | 16 ++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/license.txt b/license.txt index 7178d95..0ef1885 100644 --- a/license.txt +++ b/license.txt @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ no extra charge. 4. Derivative works must also be licensed under this license. Dynamically linking to this work does not constitute creating a derivative work. -5. If a minimum of 10 years have passed since the date of first publishing for a -part of this work, then that part is placed into the public domain and you can -do whatever you want with it, regardless of all other clauses. +5. If a minimum of 10 years have passed since the date of first publishing for +a part of this work, then that part is placed into the public domain and you +can do whatever you want with it, regardless of all other clauses. diff --git a/rationale.txt b/rationale.txt index 7a88b86..9b02e18 100644 --- a/rationale.txt +++ b/rationale.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Sunset License Rationale Purpose -First and foremost, this distribution license will be a license with a sunset +First and foremost, this distribution license will be a license with a sunset provision, to limit the duration of time before bits of the work start to pass into the public domain. @@ -44,14 +44,14 @@ Software patents are not something that will be mentioned or considered. The position taken is that if software patents are a problem in your country, you should reform the law. -Warranty disclaimers will also neither be mentioned nor considered. The position -taken is that your software should do what you say it does, and that you should -be responsible for what you release to the public. Again, if this is a problem -in your country, you should reform the law. +Warranty disclaimers will also neither be mentioned nor considered. The +position taken is that your software should do what you say it does, and that +you should be responsible for what you release to the public. Again, if this +is a problem in your country, you should reform the law. -The focus is on the work actually released, not on spreading the license itself, -so dynamic linking will not be considered to constitute making a derivative -work. +The focus is on the work actually released, not on spreading the license +itself, so dynamic linking will not be considered to constitute making a +derivative work. Waiving anti-circumvention laws should be redundant and unnecessary, as the license allows usage of the work for any purpose without restriction. -- cgit